Reviewer Guideline

1. Purpose of Review

Reviewers are responsible for evaluating submitted manuscripts in terms of originality, scientific quality, clarity, and relevance to the journal scope. The review process is double-blind to ensure fairness and academic integrity.

2. Review Criteria

Reviewers should assess manuscripts based on the following:

• Originality and novelty of the research
• Scientific accuracy and methodological soundness
• Significance and contribution to the field
• Clarity of presentation and structure
• Appropriateness of references and literature review
• Ethical considerations and academic integrity

3. Reviewer Responsibilities

• Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript and review process
• Provide objective, constructive, and unbiased feedback
• Avoid personal criticism of the author
• Declare any conflicts of interest immediately
• Complete the review within the assigned deadline

4. Review Report

Reviewers are required to submit a detailed report including:

• Overall recommendation:
  • Accept
  • Minor revision
  • Major revision
  • Reject
• Justification for the decision
• Specific comments for improvement
• Confidential comments to the editor (if any)

5. Ethical Guidelines

• Manuscripts must not be shared or used for personal research
• Plagiarism or unethical content must be reported
• Any suspicion of misconduct should be communicated to the editor